Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity of CT-guided High Dose-rate Brachytherapy in Women With Locally-advanced Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the outcome and toxicities in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with radiochemotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 67 patients with LACC treated between 2010 and 2018. The most represented stage was FIGO IIB. The patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the pelvis and boost to the cervix and parametrials. Concomitant chemotherapy (CHT) with cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/mq was planned. Subsequently, the patients underwent CT-based endouterine brachytherapy (BT). The response was evaluated at 3 months with PET-CT and/or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Since then, the patients have been followed with clinical instrumental controls every 4 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months for the following 3 years. Local response was assessed with pelvic MRI and/or PET-CT scan at the end of intracavitary BT) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The median duration of treatment was 55 days (range=40-73 days). The prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was delivered in 25 to 30 (median 28) daily fractions. The EBRT median dose to the pelvis and gross tumor volume were 50.4 Gy (range=45-56.25) and 61.6 Gy (range=45-70.4), respectively. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.44%, 80.81%, 78.84%, and 76.45% respectively. The actuarial 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 89.5%, 83.6%, 81%, and 78.2% respectively. CONCLUSION: This study analyzed acute and chronic toxicity, survival, and local control in cervical cancer patients treated with IMRT followed by CT-planned high dose rate-brachytherapy. Patients demonstrated satisfactory outcomes and incidence of acute and late toxicities.

Complete Response of a Mutated BRCA2 Metastatic Clear Cell Endometrial Adenocarcinoma to the Poly (ADP ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Olaparib.

Background: Cancer of the endometrium is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and the second most common in developing countries. Endometrioid tumors tend to have a favorable prognosis and typically present at an early stage with abnormal uterine bleeding. Clear cell carcinoma as well as serous endometrial carcinoma are associated with a poorer prognosis. Patients with metastatic endometrial cancer are treated with systemic therapy either following surgery or as primary therapy. As far as second-line chemotherapy is concerned, there are no general agreements on the chemotherapy to be used. Furthermore, to the best of knowledge, there are no studies on the use of poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in endometrial cancer even in BRCA mutated tumors. Case Report: We here present the case report of an 81-year-old woman with a mutated BRCA2 metastatic clear cell endometrial adenocarcinoma that showed an excellent clinical and radiological response to the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Conclusion: Olaparib could be successfully used in this patient setting.

Stereotactic and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Drugs: Analysis of Local Control, Toxicity, and Outcome in a Single Research Centre Case Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated local control and toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy associated with immune check point inhibitors and analyzed which oligometastatic disease setting benefits the most from local ablation in terms of advantage in overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 60 oligoprogressive patients treated with a PD-1 inhibitor in association with radiotherapy on the site of progression (119 lesions). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.7 months (range=1-39 months), we observed complete response (CR) in 45/119, partial response (RP) in 42/119, and stable disease (SD) in 30/119 patients. Nine radionecrotic events occurred. Two patients experienced grade 3 toxicities and 32 patients reported grade 2 toxicities. The number of radiologically evident metastatic organs in patients who received concomitant PD-1 inhibitors and radiotherapy showed a significant increase in survival (respectively, 73% after 12 months and 47% after 24 months) in patients with 0-3 metastatic organs compared to those with more than 3 organ sites involved (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy associated with PD-1 inhibitors is overall safe and efficacious. Patients eligible for intensification of local treatments should have less or equal to 3 metastatic organ sites.

Resilience in Radiotherapy Services During the COVID-19 Emergency: Collaboration Between the Regional Radiation Oncology Departments of Lazio, Abruzzo and Molise.

AIM: Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of oncological treatment and oncological patients show greater risk of developing complications related to COVID-19 infection. Stringent social restrictions have ensured a significant reduction in the spread of the virus, but also gave rise to a number of critical issues for radiation oncology wards. For this reason, the Directors of the Radiation Oncology Departments (RODs) of Lazio, Abruzzo and Molise regions shared their experience and ideas in order to create a common document that may assist in facing the negative impacts of the pandemic on radiation oncology wards and patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted according to the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method. Five issues were proposed and rated. Among approved issues, statements were proposed anonymously, then harmonized and finally voted on according to a Likert scale from 1 to 9. Those for which an agreement of 7-9 was observed were finally approved. RESULTS: The document was developed with 42 statements dealing about safety measures for patients and staff, organization of clinical and work activities, usage of Information Technology systems for meetings/smart working. An agreement was recorded for 34 statements. CONCLUSION: This document sets out some recommendations for RODs and can provide valuable management information for Oncological Radiotherapy wards.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost in Patients With Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy.

Background: Standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy (BT). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a possible option for treating patients ineligible for BT. Patients and Methods: From October 2012 to July 2020, nine women with cervical cancer received SBRT to high-risk volumes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rates of overall and disease-free survival. Results: The median age was 52 years; 88% of patients had squamous carcinoma. Reasons for forgoing BT were cervical canal stenosis, treatment refusal and hematological disease. The median boost dose was 18 Gy and the median dose per fraction was 6 Gy. Median follow-up was 16 months. The median survival was 24 months, the actuarial 2-year OS rate was 70%, and median disease-free survival was 11 months. One grade 3 late vaginal toxicity was reported. No acute nor late grade 4 toxicities were observed. Conclusion: SBRT boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for BT led to acceptable survival outcomes and a safe toxicity profile.

One-week vaginal brachytherapy schedule as exclusive adjuvant post-operative treatment in intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to report survival outcomes and toxicities incidence by using one-week vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) schedule in intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were treated with exclusive high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy short schedule (7 Gy/fraction/every other day/1 week). Acute and late rectal, urinary, and vaginal toxicities were recorded according to radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) scores and late effects normal tissue task force - subjective, objective, management, analytic (LENT-SOMA) scores, respectively. Overall survival (OS), cause specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (range, 6-117 months). The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS rates were 92.7%, 96.4%, and 89.5%, respectively. Seven of 108 (6.5%) patients relapsed after a median time of 31 months (range, 5-56 months). Death occurred in 6 patients. Four patients died for intercurrent causes without an evidence of disease. Acute bladder toxicity G1-G2 was reported in 11 of 108 (10%) patients, vaginal toxicity G1-G2 in 6 of 108 (5.5%), and gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 3 of 108 (3%) patients. Late bladder and gastrointestinal G1 toxicities were reported in 4 of 108 (4%) and 1 of 108 (1%) patients, respectively. Late vaginal toxicity (G1-G2) was recorded in 3 of 108 (3%) cases. No grade 3-4 bladder, vaginal, and gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive short course adjuvant VBT is an effective treatment in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer and provides good outcomes in terms of disease local control and DFS, with low rates of toxicity profile.

Residual Site Radiotherapy After Immunochemotherapy in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Monoinstitutional Retrospective Study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of residual site radiation therapy (RSRT) on local control (LC), progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival in patients with primary mediastinal lymphoma (PMBCL), following rituximab and chemotherapy treatment (ICHT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 34 patients with PMBCL treated between 2006 and 2014 with ICHT with/without autologous stem cell transplantation and RSRT. Between the end of ICHT/stem cell transplantation and RSRT, patients were evaluated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. The gross tumor volume included morphological mediastinal residual disease after ICHT/SCT. The percentage of LC, PFS and OS were assessed. RESULTS: All patients received RSRT with a median dose of 30 Gy. Median follow-up was 82 months. One patient out of 34 (3%) showed progressive disease 9 months from diagnosis. The 10-year PFS and OS were 97% and 97% respectively. CONCLUSION: RSRT in patients with PMBCL treated with ICHT did not impact unfavorably on LC and patient survival.

Post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy: long term results of a mono institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper is to investigate the outcome of patients treated with mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and the risk of late complications. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients had post-mastectomy, immediate reconstructive surgical procedure by using autologous abdominal implant; tissue expander (TE)/permanent prosthesis (PP); or even combined procedures. Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy treatment (EBRT) was delivered to the reconstructed chest wall and supraclavicular nodes, for a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis evaluates patients' rate of late side effects, Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free survival (PFS), Local-regional free survival (LRFS) and Metastasis Free Survival (MFS). The univariate analysis investigates the correlation between late toxicity and related factors. RESULTS: Between November 2003 and October 2016, 91 breast cancer patients were treated with IBR and PMRT. Twenty-three (25.3%) patients experimented late toxicity. Overall, 16 (17.6%) patients experienced late complications which required a surgical approach. The 1- 2- 5- years late toxicity rates were 96.6%, 87.1% and 77.9%, respectively. The type of reconstruction was not statistically related with late toxicity rate (P = 0.35). The median follow-up period was 59 months (range 6-142 months). Median OS was not reached, the 1- 2- 5-years OS rates were 100%, 95.4% and 81% respectively. CONCLUSION: This study underlines that the type of reconstruction does not influence late toxicity rate. Moreover, IBR followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, has showed acceptable late toxicity profile and no influence on OS.

Comparative effectiveness of multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for surgically resected or intact large brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PURPOSE: to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with large brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received surgical resection and postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery or SRS alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients with 241 large brain metastases (2-4 cm in size) who received surgery and multi-fraction SRS (mfSRS) to the resection cavity or mfSRS alone were analyzed. For all lesions the delivered dose was 3 x 9 Gy over three consecutive days. Primary endpoint of the study was local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included early improvement of neurological deficits, changes in performance status, treatment-related toxicity, radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN), distant brain failure (DBF), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and cumulative incidence function were used for comparing the probability of failure. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13 months, median OS times and 1-year survival rates were comparable: 13.5 months and 59% for patients receiving surgery and postoperative mfSRS to the resection cavity and 15.2 months and 68% for those treated with mfSRS alone (p = 0.2). Median DBF did not differ significantly between groups (surgery and mfSRS,12 months; mfSRS,14 months). Eighteen patients receiving surgery and mfSRS and 17 patients treated with mfSRS alone recurred locally (p = 0.2); respective 6-month and 12-month LC rates were 87% and 83% and 96% and 91% (p = 0.15). The 1-year cumulative incidence rates of RN were 15% and 7% after postoperative mfSRS and mfSRS alone (p = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, mfSRS is an effective treatment for patients with large brain metastases from NSCLC resulting in equivalent LC and lower RN and risk of leptomeningeal spread compared to surgery and mf-SRS to the resection cavity. Surgery is an effective treatment option for patients with large symptomatic brain metastases who require rapid relief of neurological symptoms caused by tumor mass effect.

Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with nivolumab or Ipilimumab for patients with melanoma brain metastases: evaluation of brain control and toxicity.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and ipilimumab or nivolumab in patients with untreated melanoma brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with 326 melanoma brain metastases receiving SRS in combination with ipilimumab or nivolumab were identified from an institutional database and retrospectively evaluated. Patients started systemic treatment with intravenous nivolumab or ipilimumab within one week of receiving SRS. Nivolumab was given at doses of 3 mg/kg every two weeks. Ipilimumab was administered up to four doses of 10 mg/kg, one every 3 weeks, then patients had a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg every 12 weeks, until disease progression or inacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint of the study was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were extracranial PFS, overall survival (OS), and neurological toxicity. RESULTS: Eighty patients were analyzed. Forty-five patients received SRS and ipilimumab, and 35 patients received SRS and nivolumab. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 6-month and 12-month intracranial PFS rates were 69% (95%CI,54-87%) and 42% (95%CI,24-65%) for patients receiving SRS and nivolumab and 48% (95%CI,34-64%) and 17% (95%CI,5-31%) for those treated with SRS and ipilimumab (p = 0.02), respectively. Extracranial PFS and OS were 37 and 78% in SRS and nivolumab group, respectively, and 17 and 68% in SRS and ipilimumab group, respectively, at 12 months. Sub-group analysis showed significantly better intracranial PFS for patients receiving multi-fraction SRS (3 × 9 Gy) compared to single-fraction SRS (70% versus 46% at 6 months, p = 0.01), especially in combination with nivolumab. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (24%) patients treated with SRS and ipilimumab and 6 (17%) patients who received SRS and nivolumab. Radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN) occurred in 15% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent SRS and ipilimumab or nivolumab show meaningful intracranial activity in patients with either asymptomatic and symptomatic melanoma brain metastases, although a subset of patients may develop symptomatic RN. The combination of nivolumab with SRS is associated with better intracranial control.